Additional funding to government agencies that are responding to the war in Ukraine?

This bill has Passed the House of Representatives
Bill Summary

H.R. 8035 appropriates $61 billion in additional funding to government departments and agencies that are responding to the war in Ukraine, including the Department of Defense (DOD), the United States Agency for International Development (USAID), and various private companies and nonprofit agencies. The funding will support military operations in Ukraine and provide economic support and refugee resettlement assistance, among other aims. H.R. 8035 also establishes funding oversight guidelines and expands the authority of the President to take various actions regarding the war. Sponsor: Rep. Tom Cole (Republican, Oklahoma, District 4)
View full bill text ➔

How do you feel?

You can still save your opinion to your scorecard, but since the vote has already taken place, your opinion won't be sent to your lawmakers.

Opponents say

•      "These bills were brought forward under a contrived process to achieve a pre-determined outcome — a $100 billion, unpaid-for foreign aid package while failing to secure the southern border. 

For months, House Republicans — specifically, Speaker Mike Johnson — have been unequivocal that we would not send billions in additional aid to Ukraine without securing our own border first.  This package represents a complete reversal of a position that previously unified the Republican conference, despite the clear and present danger the southern border represents to U.S. national security…With respect to Ukraine, I support its effort to defeat Putin but cannot support sending $60 billion in additional unpaid-for funding, much of which fails to go to lethal aid, without both a clear mission and the policy changes necessary to force the securing of our own border.  The Biden administration has still failed to outline a clear mission for U.S. involvement in Ukraine, despite having sent the country $113 billion previously, from which only $47 billion went to lethal aid, and another supplemental funding request is all but inevitable." Source: Rep. Chip Roy (Republican, Texas, District 21)


•      "President Biden wants the world to believe that the biggest obstacle facing Ukraine is Republicans and our lack of commitment to the global community. This is wrong.

Ukraine’s challenge is not the G.O.P.; it’s math. Ukraine needs more soldiers than it can field, even with draconian conscription policies. And it needs more matériel than the United States can provide. This reality must inform any future Ukraine policy, from further congressional aid to the diplomatic course set by the president. The Biden administration has applied increasing pressure on Republicans to pass a supplemental aid package of more than $60 billion to Ukraine. I voted against this package in the Senate and remain opposed to virtually any proposal for the United States to continue funding this war. Mr. Biden has failed to articulate even basic facts about what Ukraine needs and how this aid will change the reality on the ground." Source: Sen. J.D. Vance (Republican, Ohio)


•      "Vladimir Putin is an evil war criminal. Make no mistake about it. We all agree on that. Vladimir Putin is an evil war criminal. He did not have to invade Ukraine. There's no justification for what he did, but he did it. We are now about two years into this bloodbath and now we're in a bloody stalemate. And the reality that I think a lot of my colleagues are supporting this aid package are ignoring is that Vladimir Putin will not lose this war. Losing the war is existential for Vladimir Putin…If you're really concerned about the Ukrainian people, well, you ought to be concerned about what is happening to their country. It's hard to get the exact statistics, but I've got something like 70,000 Ukrainian soldiers killed in action, 10,000-40,000 civilians, 100,000-120,000 Ukrainians wounded. I've heard other estimates far higher than that. Russia's got about 120,000 soldiers killed in action, wounded almost 200,000. This is a bloody stalemate. I've seen some estimates of the destruction of Ukraine approaching, if not surpassing, $1 trillion. So, again, the awful reality that we need to face if we're really going to vote to add $60 billion of fuel to the fire of a bloody stalemate is what the result of that is going to be." Source: Sen. Ron Johnson (Republican, Wisconsin)

Proponents say

•     "Today, members of both parties in the House voted to advance our national security interests and send a clear message about the power of American leadership on the world stage. At this critical inflection point, they came together to answer history’s call, passing urgently-needed national security legislation that I have fought for months to secure. This package will deliver critical support to Israel and Ukraine; provide desperately needed humanitarian aid to Gaza, Sudan, Haiti, and other locations impacted by conflicts and natural disasters around the world; and bolster security and stability in the Indo-Pacific. It comes at a moment of grave urgency, with Israel facing unprecedented attacks from Iran, and Ukraine under continued bombardment from Russia. I want to thank Speaker Johnson, Leader Jeffries, and the bipartisan coalition of lawmakers in the House who voted to put our national security first." Source: President Joe Biden (Democrat)


•      "The Senate sent us effectively a blank check for foreign aid, and that was not going to work for the policy or the process in the House. It is a better process to break the bills up into four separate measures for consideration and that is what we will have tomorrow. Everyone can vote their will and their constituents desires on Israel aid, the Ukrainian aid, the Indo-Pacific, and our fourth national security package that has all of the innovations in it…So, by doing this, even though it’s not the perfect legislation, it’s not the legislation that we would write if Republicans were in charge of both the House, the Senate, and the White House, this is the best possible product that we can get under these circumstances to take care of these really important obligations. And so, we look forward to the vote tomorrow. We look forward to every member voting their conscience and their desire. And that is exactly how this process is supposed to work and how the House is supposed to operate. We’re happy to provide that and we’ll give you more comment tomorrow." Source: Sen. Mike Johnson (Republican, Louisiana, District 4) 


•      "We can't let Ukraine fall because if it does, then there's a significant likelihood that America will have to get into the conflict — not simply with our money, but with our servicewomen and our servicemen…Are we to believe that in the face of this kind of consistent aggression that if we allow Vladimir Putin to succeed in Ukraine that he's only going to stop in Ukraine? Of course not. There is a growing pro-Putin faction in the Republican party that does not want to support Ukraine and believes for some reason that Russia is not an enemy of the United States of America [...] those that want to convince the American people that the Ukrainian effort has been a failure are promoting Vladimir Putin's propaganda because the facts say the exact opposite, which is why it's important for us to finish the job. It's a Churchill or Chamberlain moment." Source: Rep. Hakeem Jeffries (Democrat, New York, District 8)