Should Congress approve an updated budget for agricultural programs with an emphasis on reduced spending?

This bill has Failed the House of Representatives
Bill Summary

This bill allocates funding for several programs related to the USDA and FDA. Additionally, it provides appropriations for farm production, conservation, and nutritional programs. There are multiple other provisions including restrictions on use of funds related to Critical Race Theory and prohibitions on food product aquisition from countries such as China. The bill also advises the prohibition of companies owned by certain foreign adversarial countries from being able to purchase farmland, restricts mifepristone use, rescinds over funds for a rural clean energy program initiated under the Inflation Reduction Act, and prohibits the creation of new guidelines related to sodium or tobacco products. It also has provisions to fund programs related to farm development and water and waste management for Federally Recognized Native American Tribes. Sponsor: Rep. Andy Harris, Republican, Maryland, District 1
View full bill text ➔

How do you feel?

You can still save your opinion to your scorecard, but since the vote has already taken place, your opinion won't be sent to your lawmakers.

Opponents say

•    "The Administration strongly opposes House passage of H.R. 4368, making appropriations for Agriculture, Rural Development, Food and Drug Administration, and Related Agencies programs for the fiscal year (FY) ending September 30, 2024 and for other purposes. The draft bills also include numerous new, partisan policy provisions with devastating consequences including harming access to reproductive healthcare, threatening the health and safety of Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Transgender, Queer, and Intersex Americans (LGBTQI+), endangering marriage equality, hindering critical climate change initiatives, and preventing the Administration from promoting diversity, equity, and inclusion. The Administration stands ready to engage with both chambers of the Congress in a bipartisan appropriations process to enact responsible spending bills that fully fund Federal agencies in a timely manner. If the President were presented with H.R. 4368, he would veto it." Source: Executive Office of the President Office of Management and Budget


•    "If enacted, the bill would slash FY 2024 agriculture spending more than 30% below the FY 2023 enacted level, a cut of more than $8.3 billion. Cloaked in claims of offering “accountability”, in truth these far-reaching cuts would only undermine the success of farmers, ranchers, rural communities, and our shared food system. The steep cuts included in the bill would have unavoidable and damaging consequences across the US food and farm system – impacting farmers, ranchers, communities, and eaters from coast to coast. In an apparent break from tradition, at the time of posting the Subcommittee has yet to publicly release what is known as a “report”, which accompanies the bill text and provides important details on program funding levels. The details of the report are important to round out our understanding of the proposal. Yet even without the report, there is more than enough to understand how damaging this proposal would be.Source: National Sustainable Agriculture Coalition


Proponents say

•    "As Americans know all too well, our country continues to face record inflation driven by the over- spending of the Biden Administration. For fiscal year 2024, the Agriculture, Rural Development, Food and Drug Administration, and Related Agencies Subcommittee’s discretionary allocation is $17.8 billion. By redirecting nearly $7.5 billion in unobligated funds from the Inflation Reduction Act, this bill funds the U.S. Department of Agriculture, the Food and Drug Administration, and Commodity Futures Trading Commission with an effective allocation of $25.3 billion – a decrease of only two percent from this fiscal year, and an increase of $188 million above FY22 levels. We simply cannot continue down this path of providing large sums of money without regard to the fiscal future of our nation.Source: Rep. Andy Harris, Republican, Maryland, District 1