Should we allow class action waivers in arbitration agreements?

This bill has Passed the House of Representatives
Bill Summary

This resolution aims to cancel the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau’s (CFPB) arbitration rule using the Congressional Review Act (CRA). The rule makes it easier for consumers to file or join a class action lawsuit related to consumer financial products. Rep. Rothfus, Keith J. [R-PA-12]
View full bill text ➔

How do you feel?

You can still save your opinion to your scorecard, but since the vote has already taken place, your opinion won't be sent to your lawmakers.

Opponents say

·      CFPB’s rule incentivizes companies to comply with the law to avoid group lawsuits. Arbitration clauses enable companies to avoid being held accountable for their conduct.
·     In fact, the current rule under CFPB reaffirms the consumer’s right to file class action lawsuits by mandating that companies explicitly state that any arbitration clauses included in a contract cannot be used to stop consumers from being part of a class action in court.

Proponents say

·     The CFPB’s own studies show that consumers who use arbitration gain more favorable outcomes than those who hire trial lawyers for class action lawsuits - the average payout for a trial lawyer in a class action lawsuit is $1 million, compared to an average payout of $32 for a consumer.
·     The anti-arbitration rule requires companies that choose arbitration to absorb the high litigation costs of class actions and the additional costs of arbitration, which discourages them from taking the optional cost of arbitration