Should Congress allocate $47.32 billion to the Department of State and other national security programs?
H.R. 8595 allocates $47.32 billion in funding to the Department of State, national security, and other programs, $2.69 billion (6%) below last year’s budget. The bill provides funding for various programs, such as overseas diplomatic policy and support, border security programs related to reducing passport and visa wait times, educational and cultural exchanges, international peacekeeping activities, and international organization memberships, including the United Nations. Funding for global health programs is made available, though this expressly prohibits payments towards abortion and involuntary sterilization, whether done as a family planning method or coercively. Funds are also allocated for international humanitarian and financial institution activities, with a specific allocation set aside for refugees resettling in Israel. The bill includes prohibitions against direct funding for the governments of Cuba, North Korea, and Iran, as well as any country whose elected head of government is deposed by any military coup d'état or decree.
Sponsor: Rep. Mario Diaz-Balart (Republican, Florida, District 26)
View full bill text ➔
How do you feel?
Opponents say
• "According to the April 20 notification, the Administration intends to reserve 100 percent of unliquidated balances for award closeouts. Yet information provided to Congress thus far indicates that closeout costs average only approximately 2 percent of total award value. The amount being set aside is therefore a gross overestimation of projected costs. We are particularly concerned that $3.2 billion from the FY25 Development Assistance and Global Health Programs accounts is being withheld for this purpose instead of being used for the purposes for which Congress appropriated these funds. We strongly opposed the indiscriminate termination of foreign assistance awards in 2025, which occurred without consultation with - or consent from - Congress. Withholding additional appropriated funds to support these terminations rather than investing in programs that advance both U.S. national interests and global stability is unconscionable and a misuse of taxpayer dollars. These funds remain subject to congressional direction, and their diversion will only compound the devastating consequences already caused by mass program cancellations and the reckless dismantling of USAID. Source: Reps. Lois Frankel (Democrat, Florida, District 22), Grace Meng (Democrat, New York, District 6), Norma J. Torres (Democrat, California, District 35), Mike Quigley (Democrat, Illinois, District 5)
• "This is a moment for American leadership—and we must rise to meet it. Lasting national security is about more than bombs, bullying, or tariffs. It demands smart diplomacy, strong development, and lifesaving humanitarian aid that prevent threats from developing before they ever reach our shores. This funding bill fails that test. I look forward to coming together to deliver a bill that reflects the very best of American leadership and truly protects the American people." Source: Rep. Lois Frankel (Democrat, Florida, District 22)
Proponents say
• "This legislation makes a clear statement about American leadership. We will engage where it matters. We will invest where it counts. And we will demand accountability for every dollar spent. On a world stage where challenges are growing and competitors are threatening the global order, this bill ensures the United States is not passive – it is prepared, it is focused, and it is leading. We are aligning our resources with our interests and delivering outcomes with a disciplined, strategic approach that reflects U.S. national priorities, upholds freedom, and promotes economic opportunity. This is an important shift. No longer will optics drive policy – results will... The measure stands firmly with our friends while drawing a clear line against our adversaries. It reinforces support for key allies – like Israel and Taiwan – and directly counters threats from Communist China, Iran, and other regimes that challenge our interests and principles. At the same time, it raises expectations for global partners to deliver measurable outcomes and demonstrate real performance. America will always lead, but strength always multiplies when others choose to match it. The values we hold as a nation are put into action." Source: Rep. Tom Cole (Republican, Oklahoma, District 4)
• " Foreign aid, properly understood, is a valuable tool a key instrument of statecraft. But every dollar of our assistance must make America safer, stronger, or more prosperous. This was the guiding principle of our reform: It must serve the American interest or it should not be paid for by the American people. That is why our new model emphasizes trade over aid, investment over dependency, and mutually beneficial partnership over permanent patronage. This budget request before you today strengthens that mission. It contains billions of dollars of investment in a revolutionized approach to foreign assistance seen in frameworks like our new America First Global Health Strategy, which we are already building through dozens of new bilateral assistance agreements, aligned with core American interests around the world. It reinforces and bolsters American economic dominance through programs like the America First Opportunity Fund, financing key strategic investments, securing access to critical minerals, rebuilding American supply chains, and developing American competitiveness in the industries of the future. It provides for robust security investments to disrupt and dismantle transnational drug trafficking networks, and allocates a historic investment in diplomatic security, to enhance our global security posture and keep our people, our property, and our interests safe as they operate in the most dangerous corners of the world." Source: Secretary of State Marco Rubio
