Allocate $58.5B for Energy, Water Development, and related agencies?
H.R. 9022 would provide $58.5 billion in funding for Energy, Water Development, and related agencies for fiscal year 2027, which is $461 million above last year’s budget. The bill allocates $35 billion to the defense portion, which includes funding for nuclear energy defense weapons activities and naval reactors. The remaining $23.5 billion is allocated to the non-defense portion, which includes provisions for the construction of river, harbor, and flood control projects, energy programs, and various research and departmental administrative costs. The bill also explicitly prohibits selling petroleum products from the Strategic Petroleum Reserve to any entity associated with the Chinese Communist Party unless these products will not be exported to China. Non-U.S. citizens from Russia and China are also not allowed to be admitted to any nuclear weapons production facility area not already accessible to the general public.
Sponsor: Rep. Charles J. “Chuck” Fleischmann (Republican, Tennessee, District 3)
View full bill text ➔
How do you feel?
Opponents say
• "To reach bipartisan agreement, funding levels and provisions require adjustments. First, we must revise balances of top line funding for defense and non-defense spending. The bill increases defense programs by $774 Million, or 2%, while non-defense programs are cut by $1.8 Billion, or 6%, and that's where innovation lies. We cannot cede our future to the past. This imbalance needs correction so that domestic energy and water programs be enhanced. Our citizenry wants a secure energy future, not captivity. We must address the most harmful cuts in the bill. These include—and I’ll tick off five, a $1.3 Billion cut, or 40% cut to critical minerals and energy innovation. That's driving the car backwards. We seek no less than $3.1 Billion to meet global competition for a cleaner energy future. We must address the irresponsible accumulation of atmospheric pollutants that are powerful indications that we must not ignore. Number two, a $50 Million cut, or 14% to Advanced Research Projects Agency ARPA- Energy for a livable future. With our global population going to head to 10 billion—10 billion over the next 50 years, we seek no less than $350 Million for transformative clean energy technologies. Third, with energy prices rising, a $25 Million cut for electricity and grid deployment programs is a nonstarter. We seek no less than $260 Million to modernize our aging grid, to drive down electricity prices. Fourth a $282 Million cut, or 12% for nuclear nonproliferation activities, is unwise in a dangerous world made more risky by the current war in the Middle East. We seek no less than $2.367 Billion to prevent the spread of nuclear weapons. We cannot retreat as nuclear threats increase. And fifth, total elimination of the Army Corps Formerly Utilized Sites Remedial Action Program. In other words, cleaning up the mess FUSRAP from the nuclear industry is unacceptable to the health of our citizenry. We seek no less than $200 Million to continue cleaning up nuclear contamination across this country." Source: Rep. Marcy Kaptur (Democrat, Ohio, District 9)
• "I oppose the bill we are considering today. It will make energy more expensive, from gasoline to electricity for homes and businesses, while families struggle to keep up with the rising cost of living. It will set us back, even as our adversaries invest in the technology of the future. It will jeopardize national security by weakening our efforts to stop the spread of nuclear weapons. And it will leave our communities vulnerable to radioactive waste leftover from our nation’s atomic weapons program. Recently, President Trump said, and I quote, "I don’t think about Americans’ financial situation." Let me tell you: it shows. It reveals just how out of touch this administration is. And how out of touch the president is." Source: Rep. Rosa DeLauro (Democrat, Connecticut, District 3)
Proponents say
• "Under President Trump’s leadership, we have seen a resurgence in domestic production, innovation, and long-term resilience. The future belongs to the nation that can out-build and out-power their competitors – and this legislation ensures America remains second to none. It unleashes U.S. production of baseload energy sources and critical minerals. It makes historic investments to secure our systems and reduce reliance on foreign supplies. And it unlocks technological capabilities to drive next-generation advancement. This includes the White House’s focus on propelling the U.S. to lead in artificial intelligence and new frontiers that keep us not only competitive – but unrivaled… With a focus on advancing nuclear capabilities and keeping our Navy’s propulsion programs top-class, we reinforce our deterrence and America’s strategic advantages. We also prioritize cybersecurity efforts that enable a resilient electric grid and ensure we can counter various threats from our adversaries. In sum, this measure recognizes that by harnessing America’s abundant domestic resources, we will continue leading the world in producing the cleanest, most reliable, and most secure energy. Chairman Fleischmann has crafted a bill that advances U.S. energy dominance, secures our strategic edge, and powers the next generation of American strength." Source: Rep. Tom Cole (Republican, Oklahoma, District 4)
• "One of the important things, in this context, is that you and the President inherited a paradigm where China was outpacing us for world dominance for the next century. The President has turned the corner on that. Now, the keys to that, we can look at AI or other economic impacts, but those really come down to energy production… Connected to that is the importance of speed in getting that done. We do have a situation right now in Corpus…we’re running out of water. I know that you’re aware of that as well, and I wanted to just remind you of that and what the Department of Energy can do to help with that—working with administration and other agencies to help with that as well." Source: Rep. Michael Cloud (Republican, Texas, District 27)
