Take corrective actions on payments before certifying that these are fraudulent or improper?
H.R. 8464 establishes requirements to prevent fraudulent payments from federal programs. The bill obligates the heads of governmental agencies to temporarily delay, partially release, or attach conditions to payments before certifying that they pose a great risk of fraud or are improper and would result in financial loss. These corrective actions must be based on an objective documented fraud-risk indicator, applied only to the portion of the payment that showed risk of fraud, and limited to the minimum period needed to verify the payment. Under this bill, the Department of the Treasury is also required to return payment vouchers to agencies if these present a high risk of fraud as identified by the Treasury’s Do Not Pay system. The bill also limits the personal accountability of Federal Government officers and employees for actions taken under these requirements.
Sponsor: Rep. James Comer (Republican, Kentucky, District 1)
View full bill text ➔
How do you feel?
Opponents say
• "I oppose H.R. 8464. The American people rely on critical federal programs to make ends meet, and this is a bill that could make it harder for some Americans due to process delays it would create. It aims to stop improper payments, which we all agree is important. Unfortunately, it uses vague criteria which could be used to stop many legitimate payments, creating more red tape delays, dysfunction, and costs. The American people want the programs they pay for to work. They don't want unnecessary red tape, delayed legitimate payments, or more dysfunction. Source: Rep. James Walkingshaw (Democrat, Virginia, District 11)
• "H.R. 8464, the Stopping Fraudulent Payments Act, would provide the Department of Treasury with the authority to pause any payment by a federal agency if the Department suspects an elevated risk of potential fraud based on a “fraud risk indicator,” which the bill defines so broadly that it includes a wide range of data points and analytics that could indicate potential fraud. This loosely defined “fraud risk indicator” would mark a significant departure from the current operation of the Do Not Pay database which currently serves to verify eligibility rather than to make potential fraud predications. This creates a significant risk of the Department continuing the trend of withholding appropriated funds by misusing sensitive information to apply subjective view-point based criteria for denying payments, similar to how this Administration has weaponized its authority to withhold payments to states like California." Source: Center for Democracy & Technology
Proponents say
• "Politicians’ perpetual addiction to buying votes and Washington’s abject failure to protect tax dollars have resulted in an unprecedented scale of fraud that threatens not only the sustainability of our safety net programs, but also the future economic viability of our nation. Instead of hunting down stolen money after the fact, these bills prevent improper payments and fraud from happening in the first place. If we’re serious about restoring fiscal sanity to Washington, we must get serious about eliminating waste, fraud, and abuse wherever they exist. I’m proud to work with Chairman Comer to protect taxpayer dollars and ensure these programs serve the people they were intended to help—not those who seek to exploit them." Source: Rep. Jodey Arrington (Republican, Texas, District 19)
• "It's clear we must do more to stop fraud and protect American taxpayers. That's why I have cosponsored the Stopping Fraudulent Payments Act (H.R. 8464). The legislation tackles the widespread “pay and chase” problem by preventing federal agencies from making payments when an agency has determined there is an elevated risk of fraud or the payment is likely to be improper. Source: Rep. Ken Calvert (Republican, California, District 41)
