Should U.S. hospitals continue at-home care for patients?

Awaiting Vote
Bill Summary

S. 2237 would extend the Acute Hospital Care at Home (AHCaH) initiative for another five years. The program allows hospitals to provide acute-level care, such as for pneumonia, COVID, or asthma, in a patient's home rather than in a hospital bed. The bill mandates a data study by the Secretary of Health and Human Services to compare home-based medical care versus traditional inpatient environments. They will measure health outcomes, hospital readmission rates, quality of care, and costs. Sponsor: Senator Tim Scott (Republican, South Carolina)
View full bill text ➔

How do you feel?

One click sends your opinion

Opponents say

•      "THE ACUTE HOSPITAL CARE AT HOME PROGRAM CANNOT PROVIDE ACUTE HOSPITAL-LEVEL CARE IN A PATIENT’S HOME…CMS’s AHCaH program endangers patients requiring acute hospital-level care by allowing hospitals to treat them in their homes. The AHCaH program builds on previous blanket Covid waivers for the hospital industry, including the Hospitals Without Walls program. Blanket waivers allow hospitals to bypass certain CMS requirements so they do not have to apply for an individual waiver, though the AHCaH program does require an individual

waiver application. The AHCaH program waives numerous Medicare provider requirements and patient safety standards that apply to acute care hospitals, including nursing, medical, and emergency services requirements… Moreover, after a doctor performs an initial medical history and physical exam for an AHCaH patient, CMS does not require any additional in-person registered nurse or doctor visits with the patient. Instead, the AHCaH program requires just two in-person patient visits a day by a community paramedic. These lower standards for nursing, medical, and emergency care under the AHCaH program put patients’ lives at risk." Source: National Nurses United (NNU)


•      "Though AHCAH probably played a negligible role in increasing hospital capacity during the PHE, the limited uptake likely reflects the implementation challenges that hospitals faced, challenges that may present fewer obstacles as providers gain more familiarity with the model. Whether providing AHCAH is less costly for hospitals than providing conventional brick-and-mortar care is a critical unresolved question that may affect the take-up of the program. The Commission’s interviews with hospitals participating in AHCAH found that beneficiaries receive fewer services (such as physician consults and laboratory tests) during an AHCAH stay than during a conventional inpatient stay. Nevertheless, the cost per unit of service may be higher due to the additional costs and inefficiencies of providing care to patients in their homes. Whether AHCAH can provide value to beneficiaries and the Medicare program—through better outcomes and reduced Medicare expenditures for follow-on care—has yet to be conclusively determined" Source: Medicare Payment Advisory Commission (MedPac)


•      "But questions remain about the program’s cost, effectiveness, and its impact on uncompensated family caregivers…Sachin Jain, president and CEO of SCAN Health Plan, says policy makers and fellow program supporters should tap the brakes on the “toxic positivity” surrounding the hospital-at-home (HaH) movement. I just think that sometimes in the course of launching new programs, there’s a bit of toxic positivity that ‘everything is better’ and nothing is worse,” Jain said. “And I’m just trying to inject a dose of realism, which is that there are some real-world patient challenges associated with the program.” While the program guidelines don’t call for family members to provide supplemental care for beneficiaries, Jason Resendez, CEO of the National Alliance for Caregiving, said that’s unrealistic. Family members have reported not even knowing their loved ones were part of the hospital-at-home program as they were “left navigating all of this additional care that’s taking place in the home,” he said. “So, clearly while the expectation is not there,” for family caregiver support, “in reality, we see it playing out,” Resendez said. “We need to better understand that in a rigorous qualitative and quantitative way." Source: Tony Pugh, Bloomberg Law

Proponents say

•      "The American healthcare system must evolve to meet the needs of the patients in the 21st century. Hospital-at-home care provides better outcomes for patients while reducing costs. This legislation ensures that successful programs like this can continue to serve families across South Carolina and the nation." Source: Senator Tim Scott (Republican, South Carolina)


•      "This important legislation would extend the Acute Hospital Care at Home (AHCaH) waiver authority through 2030 and commission a data-driven study to assess the quality, safety and equity implications of this innovative model of care. This proven program allows patients to receive hospital-level care from physicians and other members of the health care team in the comfort of their home. The AHCaH program is not a new program but the continuation of a bipartisan policy from 2020. There is no new money involved, and its success shows that innovations that deliver hospital-level care that meets patients where they are, has proven to be tremendously successful, cost-effective, leading to fewer patient readmissions, infections, and complications, especially for patients with chronic conditions who prefer care delivered in the home-based setting. This policy also frees up hospitals to treat patients whose conditions or ailments can only be treated in the inpatient setting. The AMA strongly urges lawmakers to include this five-year extension in any legislation that Congress must pass to fund the federal government before the start of the 2026 Fiscal Year on October 1st. We will work with the bill sponsors to see this important legislation advance this session." Source: American Medical Association (AMA)


•      "The AHA supports the Hospital Inpatient Services Modernization Act…The bill extends the H@H waiver for five years and directs the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) to conduct a new study of the program. Hospitals and health systems see H@H programs as a safe and innovative way to care for patients in the comfort of their homes. This kind of care is well suited for medium acuity patients who need hospital-level care but are considered stable enough to be safely monitored from home. Rather than staying three days or longer in the hospital, these patients can be treated safely by their doctor and a team of medical professionals along with the patient’s support system at home. A long-term extension of the H@H waiver will not only provide additional time to continue gathering data on quality improvement, cost savings, and patient experience, but will also provide much-needed stability for new programs and may ease state concerns about updating Medicaid policies to cover these services." Source: American Hospital Association (AHA)