Should the classified age of a “youth offender” go from 24 and above to 18 and above?

Awaiting Vote
Bill Summary

H.R. 4922 redefines a “youth offender” from an individual who is 24 or older to one who is 18 or older in the District of Columbia. The bill also prevents judges from issuing sentences below the mandatory minimum for youth offenders. Additionally, the bill prohibits the D.C. Council from changing existing criminal sentences, including laws that reduce sentences or impose exceptions for classified offenders. Furthermore, a publicly accessible website with juvenile crime statistics for the District of Columbia. Sponsor: Rep. Byron Donalds (Republican, Florida, District 19)
View full bill text ➔

How do you feel?

One click sends your opinion

Opponents say

•    "The DC CRIMES Act represents a troubling step backward in criminal justice reform. By lowering the age threshold for youth offenders to 18 and removing judicial discretion for sentencing, the bill disregards decades of research on adolescent brain development and rehabilitation. Such measures are likely to increase racial disparities and recidivism rates, undermining public safety rather than enhancing it. Furthermore, the bill infringes upon the District of Columbia’s home rule, stripping local leaders of their authority to enact evidence-based reforms tailored to the community's needs." Source: The Sentencing Project


•    "The D.C. Criminal Reforms to Immediately Make Everyone Safe Act is the fourth bill that the majority has brought to the floor to vilify, heckle, and micromanage the elected Mayor and Council of the District of Columbia on the appalling conceit that the distinguished Members of the Republican Conference from Florida or Kentucky or Arizona care more about public safety and public welfare in Washington, D.C., than do the 700,000 who live there and their elected officials on the D.C. Council and the Mayor. This one is even more sweeping and radical than their prior bills. It doesn’t simply overturn one specific current D.C. law. It permanently strips D.C. of authority over any of its criminal laws, making this legislation, perhaps inadvertently, I concede, the largest proposed rollback of D.C.’s authority to govern itself in nearly 30 years." Source: Rep. Jamie Raskin (Democrat, Maryland)

Proponents say

•    "For far too long, our nation’s capital has been plagued by an epidemic of violence due to the soft-on-crime policies of far-left, local leaders. Weak leadership by anti-cop radicals gives rise to chaos and the reign of terror unleashed on innocent residents and visitors of our nation’s capital must end now. Congress has a constitutional responsibility to oversee the District of Columbia, and it's imperative that we act quickly to assert our control when local government fails to do its job. The American people deserve better, and I will not stand idly by while our capital city devolves into chaos. My DC CRIMES Act will restore law and order to the District." Source: Rep. Byron Donalds (Republican, Florida)


•    "President Trump and House Republicans are committed to restoring law and order in our nation’s capital city. Under President Trump’s decisive leadership, crime in D.C. is now falling at an unprecedented rate. The House Oversight Committee stands ready to back the President’s swift action by advancing comprehensive legislative reforms that empower District law enforcement and tackle the escalating juvenile crime crisis head-on. Every resident and visitor deserve to feel safe in our capital, and together with President Trump, the Committee will fulfill its constitutional duty to oversee District affairs and make D.C. safe again." Source: Rep. James Comer (Republican, Kentucky)