Should the U.S. defense acquisition system reduce its reporting requirements?
H.R. 3838 authorizes reforms to the Department of Defense, allowing contracts to get faster approval for the 2026 fiscal year. The bill cuts overlapping cost and price reports for military contracts, introduces a pilot program designed to approve solutions for capability gaps in as little as 90 days, and raises the dollar threshold that triggers additional review. The bill also increases active-duty personnel by 26,100 and provides a 3.8% pay raise for service members.
Sponsor: Rep. Mike Rogers (Republican, Alabama, District 3)
View full bill text ➔
How do you feel?
Opponents say
• "The National Taxpayers Union urges Representatives to vote NO on H.R. 3838 (the FY2026 NDAA), arguing the $892 billion authorization worsens record debt and persistent trillion-dollar deficits. NTU says Congress should pursue discretionary spending cuts across defense and non-defense programs rather than approving large, long-term increases (it calls out the One Big Beautiful Bill Act’s $156 billion 10-year boost). The group recommends refocusing funds away from what it views as wasteful projects (e.g., A-10, F-35, Constellation frigates), strengthening watchdog oversight of waste/fraud/abuse, and rejecting the bill unless spending levels and program directions are substantially changed." Source: National Taxpayers Union, a taxpayer advocacy organization.
• "It’s clear to us that the SPEED Act will take us back 60 years, to a time when companies blatantly took advantage of the federal government. They will once again be able to make ‘excessive profits and disguise them as overhead costs or hide them in other ways in the absence of a set of uniform Cost Accounting Standards,’ which will lead to new $436 hammers and $10,000 toilet seat covers. Simply stated, Generally Accepted Accounting Principles are about protecting investors from being defrauded when they are considering the value of a company; Cost Accounting Standards are about protecting the government and taxpayers when they are considering the value of a contract." Source: Scott Amey, General Counsel for Project On Government Oversight (POGO)
Proponents say
• "Peace through Strength can only be achieved by maintaining American deterrence. But our military is saddled with a bureaucratic acquisition system that is so dysfunctional that the process between identifying a need to deploying it in the field can take more than a decade. By that time the threat has changed, the technology is outdated, and the program is over budget. The SPEED Act transforms our acquisition system so that it can fulfill its most important mission: getting our warfighters what they need, when they need it. I appreciate Ranking Member Smith for working with me on this important bipartisan legislation." Source: Rep. Mike Rogers (Republican, Alabama)
• "For the 65th consecutive year, House Armed Services Committee Democrats and Republicans have worked across the aisle to craft a bipartisan defense bill. This year’s bill fundamentally reforms the Defense Acquisition System (DAS) to cut through red tape and deliver capabilities to service members as quickly and effectively as possible so they can respond to rapidly evolving scenarios. The bill as passed out of committee ensures service members and their families remain among our core priorities. It also authorizes critically-needed investment in America’s industrial base so we can get to capacity in terms of critical munitions and other critical technologies." Source: Rep. Adam Smith (Democrat, Washington)