Should Congress strip California’s ability to set stricter car emission standards?
H.J. Res. 88 is a joint resolution that would cancel the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) notice called, "California State Motor Vehicle and Engine Pollution Control Standards; Advanced Clean Cars II; Waiver of Preemption; Notice of Decision (90 Fed. Reg. 642)", which was published on January 6, 2025. The notice had approved California’s request to set its own rules for car and engine emissions under its Advanced Clean Cars II (ACC II) program.
Sponsor: Rep. John Joyce (Republican, Pennsylvania, District 13)
View full bill text ➔
How do you feel?
Opponents say
• "Approving the Advanced Clean Cars II program is an important step in the ongoing progress needed to clean the nation’s air. Now that EPA has reaffirmed California’s authority and approved the waiver to authorize implementation of this program, California and the other states that have adopted it can move ahead with stronger tools to reduce air pollution. Implementing and enforcing the ACC II program will have lifesaving benefits in the states that have adopted it." Source: Harold Wimmer, President and CEO for the American Lung Association.
• "The Alliance has long supported state flexibility under the Clean Air Act (CAA) that permits California to adopt, and allows other states and territories to follow, regulations that can have more protective emissions standards than the federal standards. In comments to EPA, the Alliance encouraged timely approval of California’s waiver request for the Advanced Clean Cars II (ACC II) regulation. ACC II accelerates the adoption of zero-emission light-duty vehicles and supports our shared goals to confront the climate crisis, reduce harmful air pollution, advance environmental justice, promote American manufacturing and good-paying jobs, save consumers money, and protect public health. The Alliance stands firmly with California and its authority under the CAA to set its own vehicle emission standards, as well as the other states and territories that choose to voluntarily adopt those standards." Source: United States Climate Alliance
Proponents say
• "The American people should choose what vehicle is right for them, not California bureaucrats. Congressman Joyce’s resolution would block a disastrous ban on the gas-powered vehicles that millions of Americans rely on each and every day. The Energy and Commerce Committee has been committed to addressing this issue since California first attempted to create a de facto EV mandate. By passing the Preserving Choice in Vehicle Purchases Act and the Choice in Automobile Retail Sales Act in the last Congress, along with introducing this Congressional Review Act resolution, we have continued to stand up to this far-left policy that would harm consumers. Thank you, Congressman Joyce, for your work to ensure that families can continue to choose the vehicles they need." Source: Chairman Brett Guthrie (Republican, Kentucky, District 2), via the sponsor's Press Release
• "Consumer choice in purchasing a vehicle is important to the success of both auto manufacturers and dealers. Government should not dictate arbitrary mandates to force consumers into a product or create taxpayer subsidies to promote any one technology. We believe the free market is the best way to promote any new advancements in technology for the automotive market. We support the end of EV mandates, and we should let the consumer once again be free to choose the vehicle that best suits their needs." Source: Vice President of Shively Motors Inc. Bryan J. Burkholder