Should Congress abolish the Department of Education?
The "Returning Education to Our States Act" proposes abolishing the U.S. Department of Education within 180 days of the Act's enactment. It reallocates its responsibilities across other federal agencies: educational programs for students with disabilities and Impact Aid to the Department of Health and Human Services, as well as federal student loan and grant programs to the Department of the Treasury. States would receive block grants for elementary, secondary, and postsecondary education based on student enrollment figures, with funds intended for broad educational use. Conditions for grants include annual audits, data reporting, and compliance with federal civil rights laws, which the Department of Justice would oversee. Misused funds may result in repayment or withholding of future funds. The Act aims to decentralize federal educational oversight and enhance state control.
Sponsor: Sen. Mike Rounds (Republican, South Dakota)
View full bill text ➔
How do you feel?
Opponents say
• "While those who want to terminate the Department of Education assert that whatever civil rights protections and programs they may want to continue to enforce and fund can be done elsewhere, Project 2025 is clear that the federal role should be dramatically reduced, several aid programs should be narrowed or eliminated, and ED should be eliminated. Eliminating a central hub of expertise and fracturing the administration of related programs over several other agencies is designed to make them less effective for students and families and hinder cooperation and efficiency between civil servants, states, districts, schools, and colleges and universities. It also puts responsibilities on other agencies who don’t have expertise in those areas, have their own goals and priorities, and provides zero extra funding for hiring, training, or other important planning steps, let alone actual administrative action. While all of this is happening, rights aren’t being enforced, aid is being held up to students, states, schools, and colleges, technical assistance isn’t being provided to grantees, and student loan repayment applications aren’t being processed." Source: Reid Setzer, Director of Government Affairs at EdTrust
• "This is absurd. The Dept. of Ed ensures equity in schools, funds low-income districts (Title I), provides financial aid, supports special ed (IDEA), enforces civil rights, collects key data, and sets standards. If cut, it will widen disparities and harm students nationwide." Source: Rep. Kadyn Wittman (Democrat, South Dakota House of Representatives, District 15)
• "The U.S. Department of Education plays a crucial role in protecting our most vulnerable children, ensuring they receive the quality education they deserve. Programs such as Title I and the Individuals with Disabilities Act (IDEA) are designed to support low-income and disabled children and are vital to their success and well-being. Transferring these programs to other departments would expose these children to bureaucracies where their specific needs are not the primary focus, leaving them vulnerable and underserved." Source: Loren Paul, President of South Dakota Education Association
Proponents say
• "Unelected bureaucrats in Washington, D.C. should not be in charge of our children’s intellectual and moral development. States and local communities are best positioned to shape curricula that meet the needs of their students. Schools should be accountable. Parents have the right to choose the most appropriate educational opportunity for their children, including home school, public school, or private school." Source: Rep. Thomas Massie (Republican, Kentucky, District 4)
• "The Department of Education is a nest of radical D.C. activists masquerading as educators pushing indoctrination schemes of radical anti-American ideas. For our children’s protection, it must be abolished. Across our country, we have seen taxpayer dollars used to expose children to radical gender and race ideologies without the consent of their parents. The education of our children should not belong to the federal government – it is time to return those rights to parents." Source: Rep. Barry Moore (Republican, Alabama, District 2)
• "The federal Department of Education has never educated a single student, and it’s long past time to end this bureaucratic Department that causes more harm than good. We all know local control is best when it comes to education. Everyone raised in South Dakota can think of a teacher who played a big part in their educational journey. Local school boards and state Departments of Education know best what their students need, not unelected bureaucrats in Washington, D.C". Source: Sen. Mike Rounds (Republican, South Dakota)