Should the DHS strengthen restrictions on the border?

Awaiting Vote
Bill Summary

The bill gives the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) more power to handle non-U.S. nationals near the southwest border and provides extra funds for this purpose. DHS can quickly remove or block entry to certain people if it encounters 4,000 or more in a week, with stricter measures required at higher numbers. The bill also speeds up the asylum claim process, sets timelines for decisions, and makes it more difficult for some individuals to stay in the U.S. while their claims are processed. It extends immigration options for Afghan citizens who helped the U.S. mission and raises pay for asylum officers. DHS can also hire staff more quickly to carry out these changes. Sponsor: Sen. Chris Murphy (Democrat, Connecticut)
View full bill text ➔

How do you feel?

One click sends your opinion

Opponents say

•    "I will not vote for the bill coming to the Senate floor this week because it includes several provisions that will violate Americans’ shared values. These provisions would not make us safer. This bill also misses key components that can go much further in solving the serious immigration problems facing our nation. The proposed bill would exclude people fleeing violence and persecution from seeking asylum and instead doubles down on failed anti-immigrant policies that encourage irregular immigration. It does not provide relief for Dreamers, farmworkers, or other longtime American residents, nor take steps to attract and retain the world’s brightest young minds. It would not completely relieve problems at the border because it does not address the root causes of regional migration. Any discussion on immigration reform must include these common sense, popular policies that would make meaningful changes to our immigration system." Sen. Cory Booker (Democrat, New Jersey)


•    "Instead of considering H.R. 2 — House Republicans’ legislation that would immediately secure the border — Senator Schumer once again wasted time today voting on an immigration bill that doesn’t secure the border, incentivizes further illegal immigration, and has no chance of passing either the House or the Senate. After more than three years of claiming the situation at our southern border was not a crisis while millions of illegals poured in, Congressional Democrats are attempting to throw an election year Hail Mary to cover for their embrace of President Biden’s open border policies." Speaker of the House Mike Johnson (Republican, Louisiana, District 4) 


•    "This bill would eviscerate our asylum system by eliminating critical and longstanding due process protections like judicial review, rushing people through an expedited asylum process at a significantly higher legal standard and with new mandatory bars at the screening stage, and excluding many people from even seeking the protection of asylum when the new expulsion power is in effect, no matter how meritorious their claims may be. This dangerous new expulsion system– like Title 42 before it– will arbitrarily cut people off from protection, lead to more chaos and confusion at our side of the southern border, and feed human trafficking on the other side. Many people are already waiting many weeks or months for a scarce port appointment in dangerous conditions; as the Title 42 experience demonstrated, shutting down the border will only leave more people in danger and with no reason to wait for a port appointment." Source: American Civil Liberties Union

Proponents say

•    "What's been negotiated would - if passed into law - be the toughest and fairest set of reforms to secure the border we’ve ever had in our country. It would give me, as President, a new emergency authority to shut down the border when it becomes overwhelmed. And if given that authority, I would use it the day I sign the bill into law." Source: President Joe Biden 


•   
"This bill does not do everything we need to do to reform our broken immigration system. Of course, I want a pathway to citizenship for people that are living in the shadows. I want to make sure that those kids who know nothing except for being Americans have a chance to stay here permanently. But this bill is a really important downpayment, a really important bipartisan downpayment on border security and immigration reform." Source: Sen. Chris Murphy (Democrat, Connecticut) 


•    "The Border Act would have fundamentally shifted our approach to illegal immigrants from "catch and release" to "detain and deport" by requiring a higher standard for asylum and an expedited process for removal. It closed loopholes that incentivize migration and imposed immediate consequences for those who choose to ignore our laws and illegally cross into our country. The Border Act also increased detention capacity and provided new funding to hire Border Patrol agents." Sen. Lisa Murkowski (Republican, Alaska)