Stop Secret Service protection for convicted felons?
This bill, H.R. 8081, would terminate Secret Service protection for individuals who have been convicted of a federal or state felony that carries a potential sentence of at least one year of imprisonment. Currently, the law does not specify how Secret Service protection would occur if a protectee is sentenced to prison following a conviction for a felony. The felony conviction may present logistical difficulties for both the Secret Service and prison authorities at a Federal and State level, so this bill removes the potential for conflicting lines of authority within prisons and allows judges to weigh the sentencing of individuals without being concerned with Secret Service protection. Sponsor: Rep. Bennie Thompson (Democrat, Mississippi, District 2)
View full bill text ➔
How do you feel?
Opponents say
• "Prison isn’t necessarily a safer place, you can ask Mr. Epstein’s family about that, and to suggest that somehow [one would] have the security necessary in prison is just not an accurate statement" Source: Rep. Mark Green (Republican, Tennessee, District 7)
• "Texans believe that, regardless of party, Presidents of the United States of America, both current and former, must be protected. Considering Saturday's assassination attempt on President Trump, which resulted in him being literally shot in the ear and in other innocent Americans being killed or injured, and, since you, just three months ago, sponsored legislation (HR 8081) to remove his Secret Service protective detail, we, the undersigned current and future members of the Texas Legislature, call on you to immediately resign your position in Congress." Source: Texas State Rep. Brian Harrison (Republican, STATE, District 10)
• "I can only imagine what could have happened had House Democrats been successful in their attempts to terminate his Secret Service detail. This should be a sobering reminder to them and others on the Left that their rhetoric and actions matter. Our democratic process will not be deterred by this baseless act, as President Trump so powerfully demonstrated. Millions of Americans will never forget seeing his fist in the air — a symbol of hope, courage, and strength in the face of despicable evil." Rep. Michael McCaul (Republican Texas, District 10)
Proponents say
• "Unfortunately, current law doesn’t anticipate how Secret Service protection would impact the felony prison sentence of a protectee—even a former President. It is regrettable that it has come to this, but this previously unthought-of scenario could become our reality. Therefore, it is necessary for us to be prepared and update the law so the American people can be assured that protective status does not translate into special treatment—and that those who are sentenced to prison will indeed serve the time required of them." Source: Rep. Bennie Thompson (Democrat, Mississippi, District 2)
• "As a sitting member of congress we don’t even get secret service protection so why should taxpayers foot the bill for someone who a jury of his/her peers has deemed guilty of a felony or in this case 34 of ‘em, if they are sentenced to time. The prison is full of officers not to mention, why should we make an entire team of public servants have to go to prison, too?!"
Source: Rep. Jasmine Crockett (Democrat, Texas, District 30)
• "Should it come to that, there would have to be a lot of discussions within the department about what to seek, and what kind of accommodations could be made to ensure that there is some sort of penalty, but that takes into consideration the difficulties of incarcerating a former president who is still under Secret Service detail. And that might be some sort of form of house arrest or something like that. Because it really would be a pretty enormous burden on our prison system to have to incarcerate Donald Trump. " Source: Executive Director of the Institute for Constitutional Advocacy and Protection and former Assistant Attorney General for National Security Mary McCord