Should Congress approve changes to funding, general processes, and safety procedures for the Federal Aviation Administration?

This bill has Passed the House of Representatives
Bill Summary

This bill includes a number of provisions related to the reauthorization of Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) infrastructure and its processes for the following five years. It also extends certain excise taxes that support the Airport and Airway Trust Fund, which is the main funding source for aviation-related projects and infrastructure. In addition, the bill authorizes increased funds for the improvement of airports while creating a National Center for Aerospace Advancement. Other issues are addressed such as improved tower marking, which is critical for safety, airshow safety, pilot retirement age, and aircraft registration validity. Sponsor: Rep. Sam Graves (Republican, Missouri, District 6)
View full bill text ➔

How do you feel?

You can still save your opinion to your scorecard, but since the vote has already taken place, your opinion won't be sent to your lawmakers.

Opponents say

•    "In 2009, Flight 3407 crashed in Clarence, New York, killing everyone on board and one person on the ground. The 2010 FAA Reauthorization bill took bold, bipartisan action to address the flight safety issues that cause this tragic crash. This included the 1,500-hour pilot training rule, which significantly increased the number of required flight training hours from just 250 to 1,500 hours. Since then, commercial aviation fatalities have decreased by 99.8 percent. The new FAA Reauthorization legislation introduced last week includes a provision allowing an additional 150 hours of the 1,500-hour rule standard to be completed in a simulator. We oppose this change. It veers off course from the reforms we fought so hard for. We cannot falter on safety standards that this body of Congress has fought alongside the Flight 3407 Families to achieve.Source: Rep. Brian Higgins (Democrat, New York, District 26)


•    "A pillar of these reforms is the “1,500 Hour Rule” which requires first officers, also known as co-pilots, to have a minimum of 1,500 hours of flight training time. Since this rule was implemented in 2012, our skies have never been safer. But as the 2023 FAA reauthorization bill is debated, regional airlines and special interests are calling to roll back this hard-fought requirement — a decision that would only put the flying public and our pilots at risk.Source: The Hill (Op-Ed with Rep. Brian Higgins, Rep. Nick Langworthy, Rep. Joe Morelle, Rep. Claudia Tenney)

Proponents say

•    " The FAA Bill is critical for our jobs. If the FAA is not funded, we don’t have the proper staffing and infrastructure to support the demand of the traveling public. We see it today with operational meltdowns and reduced schedules due to slowed air traffic in order to maintain the highest levels of safety while ATC has been severely understaffed and working expertly, but with outdated technology. This is the result of repeated prior extensions of the FAA authorization bills that strained and set back our aviation system due to repeated failures of Congress to pass long-term authorization bills with proper funding because of highly controversial policy provisions that were selfishly promoted at the expense of passengers and aviation workers. Safety too can become a major issue when the national air system is stretched thin. That’s why it’s critical that Congress get an FAA bill done without any threats of shutdown or extensions. As H.R. 3995 moves toward the full House for a vote, we will do everything in our power to strip from the bill the age 67 pilot retirement amendment that was added during the House T&I Committee markup. It’s not a serious proposal for meeting travel demand…Bottom line: The proposal is complicated, costly, wastes time, and is a gross violation of worker rights and collective bargaining. It is not good policy and needs to be removed before passage of the final bill.Source: Press Release, Association of Flight Attendants 


•    "As representatives of various sectors of the GA (General Aviation) community, we’re thrilled that your bipartisan Securing Growth and Robust Leadership in American Aviation Act (H.R. 3935) recognizes that the U.S. aviation sector is dependent upon a strong GA community and includes the first-ever GA title to secure the long-term success of American aviation…. These provisions, among others in the GA title, combined with provisions found in other titles of the bill, will not only unlock the full potential of GA operations but will also guarantee that American aviation will thrive for decades to come. We strongly urge support for H.R. 3935 and look forward to working with the Committee in advancing this landmark FAA reauthorization bill." 

Source: Press Release, General Aviation (A coalition of several aviation related groups)


•    "On behalf of air passengers with spinal muscular atrophy (SMA), many of whom fly with a power wheelchair, Cure SMA appreciates that your Securing Growth and Robust Leadership in American Aviation Act (H.R. 3935) includes provisions to help address air travel challenges faced by passengers with SMA and other disabilities. While the disability-related provisions included in H.R. 3935 are meaningful, we respectfully ask that you strengthen the training and accessibility standard provisions to improve the air travel experience for people with disabilities...Cure SMA respectfully asks that you enhance the training provisions in the final legislation by requiring hands-on-training related to boarding and deplaning a passenger who uses a wheelchair and for stowage of wheelchairs and other mobility devices, such as scooters." Source: Kenneth Hobby (President, Cure SMA) and Maynard Friesz (Vice-President, Cure SMA)