Should Congress repeal fee adjustments made by the Federal Housing Finance Agency?

This bill has Passed the House of Representatives
Bill Summary

This bill seeks to cancel changes made to the loan pricing adjustments charged by government-sponsored financial enterprises such as Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac made earlier this year. It would also require a study to be conducted by the Comptroller General of the United States to determine the impact of revisions made by the Federal Housing Finance Agency to the single-family pricing framework. Sponsor: Rep. Warren Davidson (Republican, Ohio, District 8)
View full bill text ➔

How do you feel?

You can still save your opinion to your scorecard, but since the vote has already taken place, your opinion won't be sent to your lawmakers.

Opponents say

•   "We are concerned that Congress is attempting to set mortgage pricing fees for loans purchased by the Government Sponsored Enterprises (GSEs). This is the role of their regulator, the Federal Housing Finance Agency (FHFA). A return to the former pricing matrix would raise the cost of homeownership and make it more expensive for first-time homebuyers and borrowers of color seeking conventional loans. The bill also fails to advance housing affordability and does not offer a solution for the millions of mortgage-ready consumers who desire and can succeed in homeownership. Prior to FHFA mandating upfront Loan Level Price Adjustment (LLPA) fees, the GSEs had a stronger track record of purchasing loans made to Black, Latino, AAPI, and Native communities. Since FHFA instituted LLPAs in 2008, the GSEs have grossly underserved the very borrowers on whom the health of the future housing finance system depends. LLPAs also unfairly place the potential burden of future catastrophic risk on the backs of the borrowers who were most harmed by the Great Recession. LLPAs must be eliminated. They force creditworthy first-time homebuyers and borrowers of color to pay more for mortgages, which prices them out of the conventional market. The GSEs’ charters mandate that they serve the whole of the market — not just wealthier borrowers purchasing second homes and investors. FHFA’s recent changes move the system toward greater safety and soundness, which is ultimately in everyone’s best interest." Source: Nikitra Bailey, Executive Vice President of the National Fair Housing Alliance (NFHA)

Proponents say

•   "I am proud to be an original cosponsor of Mr. Davidson's legislation, the Middle Class Borrower Protection Act. This bill repeals the recent FHFA change to mortgage pricing, it institutes a freeze on any mortgage pricing changes pending a review by the Government Accountability Office, and it makes future mortgage pricing changes subject to the standard public notice and comment period. This will hold the FHFA accountable to the American people – and by the way, the FHFA is supposed to be working for the American people, not the other way around – and prevent it from ever attempting to enact a credit score redistribution plan again to politicize homeownership. I encourage my colleagues on this committee to support its passage in this markup." Source: Rep. Tom Emmer (Republican, Minnesota, District 6)