Should Congress void a ruling that would create new standards for commercial trucking manufacturers to reduce air pollution?

This bill has Passed the House of Representatives
Bill Summary

This bill is a joint resolution to nullify the rule “Control of Air Pollution From New Motor Vehicles: Heavy-Duty Engine and Vehicle Standards”, previously finalized by the EPA. This rule aimed to curtail emissions of air pollutants such as Nitrous Oxides (NOX), from new heavy-duty engines. After passing the Senate, the nullification also passed in the House with a 221 - 203 yay/nay split on 5/23/2023. Sponsor: Sen. Deb Fischer (Republican, Nebraska)
View full bill text ➔

How do you feel?

You can still save your opinion to your scorecard, but since the vote has already taken place, your opinion won't be sent to your lawmakers.

Opponents say

  "Before the EPA action, it will have been more than 20 years since the agency had last updated heavy-duty emission standards for NOX pollution. These new standards are needed now because the science is clear, this pollution poses serious threats to public health. The tragic outcomes include premature death, respiratory illnesses like childhood asthma, cardiovascular problems, and other detrimental health impacts. The trucking industry is the leading source of this dangerous air pollution and is especially dangerous for the 72 million Americans who live near truck freight routes across the United States. The EPA rule will cut NOX pollution from these vehicles by half by 2045. That will make a huge difference because one in three Americans live in counties with unhealthy air and 100,000 Americans die every year from premature deaths associated with air pollution…The manufacturers of the Emissions Control Association, which is a non-profit group that provides technical information on emission control technologies, concluded that a 90% reduction in NOX emissions is feasible by 2027. Not only are the heavy-duty NOX rules achievable but they can be implemented in a cost-effective manner." Source: Rep. Frank Pallone, Energy and Commerce Committee Ranking Member (Democrat, New Jersey, District 6)


  "We commend the EPA’s heroic effort in cleaning up America’s highly polluting heavy-duty trucking fleet. Many of our districts span busy transportation and trucking corridors, exposing our constituents to pollutants and air toxins that increase the risk of asthma attacks, lung cancer, stroke, and premature deaths in our communities…[these] clean air standards that will improve the health and well-being of 72 million impacted Americans living, working, and going to school near truck freight routes. In stark contrast, S.J. Res. 11 weakens emissions standards and is expected to cost our communities billions of dollars in overall benefits. Republicans, in their misguided attempt to overturn this EPA rule, are willing to go against the robust and comprehensive scientific evidence that air pollution is bad for our well-being. Clean air is a human right, and this rule represents a sorely overdue update to clean air standards for our families and communities." Source: Rep. Don Beyer (Democrat, Virginia) House Sustainable Energy and Environment Coalition (SEEC)

Proponents say

  "I’m glad to see the House pass our legislation to stop this aggressive Biden regulation because every American consumer will feel the effects of this rule and its price increases. Raising costs and driving truckers out of business isn’t just bad for the transportation sector — it would be devastating for an economy still reeling from the impacts of inflation. I encourage President Biden to reevaluate his misguided veto threat and sign this bipartisan bill into law." Source: Sen. Deb Fischer (Republican, Nebraska)


  "This rule would force owner-operators to leave the market or keep older trucks on the road. This rule is unrealistic given the heavy-duty vehicle technology space, and this rule would add at least $8,000 to the cost of each new semi-truck. And the cost doesn’t go to producers, the people who grow the grain, produce the oil, or get the natural gas out of the ground; it goes to the consumers. And instead of expanding the equipment market and recognizing the significant reduction of nitrogen oxide, this rule is another assault on liquid fuels that will further complicate the supply chain. The rule jeopardizes our ability to feed and fuel the country." Source: Rep. Kelly Armstrong (Republican, North Dakota) On the floor of the House during a debate on 5/23/23