Should we ban immigration arrests, interviews, searches, and surveillance at more locations?
Sensitive locations are places where U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) officers are kept from pursuing arrests, interviews, searches, and surveillance unless dangerous or demanding situations occur. Current locations include schools, hospitals, and places of worship. This bill would expand the list to include additional health care, educational or religious facilities, and other public spaces where the threat of ICE would keep people from seeking services or participating in their community. It would also require the Department of Homeland Security to provide training to officers and report to Congress on any enforcement activity occurring at sensitive locations. Sponsor: Representative Adriano Espaillat [D-NY-13]
View full bill text ➔
How do you feel?
Opponents say
• Attorney General Jeff Sessions and Department of Homeland Security (DHS) Secretary John Kelly adamantly defended ICE writing: “The arrest of people in a public place based upon probable cause has long been held by the United States Supreme Court as constitutionally permissible.”
Proponents say
• Rep. Jose Serrano insists: "ICE activities at these vital, essential locations create a disincentive for immigrants, even those who are documented, from doing things like accessing basic benefits, reporting crimes, and ensuring their health and well-being."